Wright Wronged
from Keeanga-Yamahtta Taylor's latest column over at Socialist Worker:
After more than a month of media denunciations and racist abuse, Wright came out swinging. He framed the attacks against him as an attack on the Black church and Black religiosity, pointing to a long list of Black religious figures targeted for media and state vitriol--among them, Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X.
Moreover, Wright continued to challenge the hypocrisy of the U.S. government. He talked about U.S. support for the apartheid regime in South Africa and for the murderous right-wing contras in Nicaragua in the 1980s; he complained about the U.S. government spending billions on the war in Iraq while people are going hungry in the U.S.; he decried the U.S. sending 4,000 "boys and girls to die for a lie"; and he denounced unfair sentencing in drug cases that has resulted in 1 million African Americans being imprisoned.
Media pundits picked out two portions of the question-and-answer segment of his appearance at the National Press Club as the basis for declaring that Wright is racist and paranoid.
First, Wright refused to attack Louis Farrakhan, saying, "Louis Farrakhan is not my enemy. He did not put me in chains. He did not put me in slavery. And he didn't make me this color."
Second, while the Times claimed Wright accused the U.S. government of creating AIDS, what he actually said was more damning:Based on this Tuskegee experiment and based on what has happened to Africans in this country, I believe our government is capable of doing anything. In fact, in fact, in fact, one of the--one of the responses to what Saddam Hussein had in terms of biological warfare was a non-question, because all we had to do was check the sales records. We sold him those biological weapons that he was using against his own people. So any time a government can put together biological warfare to kill people, and then get angry when those people use what we sold them, yes, I believe we are capable.
Finally, Wright refused to back away from statements comparing Israeli treatment of Palestinians as apartheid -- as former President Jimmy Carter has, and anti-apartheid leader Desmond Tutu as well.
Of course, the media are incapable of engaging and debating Wright's ideas. Instead, like petulant brats, they resort to name-calling.
...
The media believe their own constructed and static caricatures of working-class white voters as irredeemably racist and unwilling to vote for a Black man -- even though Obama has gotten literally millions of votes from white workers, and cut into Clinton's massive leads among white voters in both Pennsylvania and Ohio in the days leading up to the primaries.
When the media got word of Wright's speaking engagements, it pre-judged that white Americans would be offended, and then shaped the story in such a way as to make sure they were offended, by couching Wright as a crazy Black racist.
Yet it is the American media that are craven and racist. They have always had a double standard for African Americans or any people of color who denounce racism and injustice in this country. Now, Obama is discovering -- if he didn't know already--that he can run, but can't hide, from race in this country.
As Taylor notes, one of those adding his misinformed voice to the chorus was Chicago Sun-Times columnist/make-believe film "critic" Richard Roeper. That reminded me of a column he wrote in 1989 coming out swinging against the new Public Enemy single "Welcome To The Terrordome." One line taken wildly out of context was used to paint them as anti-Semitic, and Roeper enthusiastically jumped on that bandwagon. One of his main criticisms of the lyrics was their supposed "bad grammar." I shit you not. "Bad grammar." Of course, the racist and sexist overtones (to say nothing of the rampant grammatical errors that apparently induce conniption fits in Roeper) of the Rolling Stones' "Some Girls" and "Brown Sugar" escaped Roeper's notice in his review of Shine A Light. Must've been a coincidence.


